A forum for those interested in issues around practicing, doing and teaching CI in this region. Get people from the region together on-line, communicate issues, promote CI in the region.
The most controversial problem of the picture questioned by Rainer Michaeli and me is connected with East Germany belonging to Eastern Europe and Berlin (probably only West) belonging to Western Europe. Next, why Poland (24°09'E) belongs to Eastern Europe and Finland (31°35'E), Norway (31°03'E), Greece (29°38'E), and Sweden (24°15'E) to Western Europe? It's because you wish to use the political criterion, not the geographical one, isn't that so? However, the political criterion used in that picture to draw a line between Western Europe and Eastern Europe is the criterion of the past. Today, the political situation of States described on the picture is extremely various. Concerning any intelligence problem, the most important is the fact that some of those States are members of NATO and the EU, which means that they are expected to obey some security regulations (see, for example, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:164... ).
Dear Tad,
I have mentioned in my comments that it was my overlooking the picture (regarding East Germany). Some colour nuances sometimes I don't at first see :). That's I guess why I always ask someone sitting next to me when I drive, is it red, is red ?
I agree some criteria wouldn't be bad to have. Maybe some renaming is needed.
I should have maybe consulted with more people. My pure intention was to start bringing us together and maybe by doing so some local communities in long term future will form from this. In other words if I would create a group on CI in Croatia, we could be speaking there in our local language, but we would be very few, some even wouldn't be joining us for this or that reason.
I haven't so much thought about naming and thank you for bringing up that question.
Bringing up such group is also result of talks I had on many occasion earlier with people from this region on SCIP's conferences (when I mentioned Eastern europe I refered to new accession countries + ex-yu+ex ussr). Some of them were from Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia. And I always heard questions like: what are you doing, let's do something together, what do you do to help create some local CI community (whether formal or informal), can we apply some of your approaches. I was also pushed by seeing at last SCIP annual conference only one person from Poland and three of us from Croatia. If someone else was there appologies, haven't notice you.
If there are some suggestions we can change the naming or make clear definition what is ment not to confuse or annoy anyone. Maybe we can call it even CI in European emerging markets or something like that to avoid any political context.
I think that users of the forum will in any way decide whether this group makes sense or not, by putting up questions and discussions.
All suggestions are wellcome! This is not my property:)
Of course the representation is geo-political inasmuch as Poland, for instance, was last occupied by the Soviet Union and designation of East and West was based upon that relationship.
The new resurrection of the Great Bear of Russia makes these new situations vis a vis EU and NATO a real problem intelligence wise. As the Bear exerts pressure, the lines will blur.
Mislav Jurisic
I have mentioned in my comments that it was my overlooking the picture (regarding East Germany). Some colour nuances sometimes I don't at first see :). That's I guess why I always ask someone sitting next to me when I drive, is it red, is red ?
I agree some criteria wouldn't be bad to have. Maybe some renaming is needed.
I should have maybe consulted with more people. My pure intention was to start bringing us together and maybe by doing so some local communities in long term future will form from this. In other words if I would create a group on CI in Croatia, we could be speaking there in our local language, but we would be very few, some even wouldn't be joining us for this or that reason.
I haven't so much thought about naming and thank you for bringing up that question.
Bringing up such group is also result of talks I had on many occasion earlier with people from this region on SCIP's conferences (when I mentioned Eastern europe I refered to new accession countries + ex-yu+ex ussr). Some of them were from Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia. And I always heard questions like: what are you doing, let's do something together, what do you do to help create some local CI community (whether formal or informal), can we apply some of your approaches. I was also pushed by seeing at last SCIP annual conference only one person from Poland and three of us from Croatia. If someone else was there appologies, haven't notice you.
If there are some suggestions we can change the naming or make clear definition what is ment not to confuse or annoy anyone. Maybe we can call it even CI in European emerging markets or something like that to avoid any political context.
I think that users of the forum will in any way decide whether this group makes sense or not, by putting up questions and discussions.
All suggestions are wellcome! This is not my property:)
Cheers
May 14, 2009
Jerry Spencer
The new resurrection of the Great Bear of Russia makes these new situations vis a vis EU and NATO a real problem intelligence wise. As the Bear exerts pressure, the lines will blur.
May 27, 2009